لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It is additionally a properly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
four. It's been noticed by this Court that there is actually a delay of in the future in the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged incidence and the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram occurred to get the real brothers of your deceased but they did not react in any way on the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glance much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is not any explanation as to why her arrest wasn't effected after making in the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on numerous situations that extra judicial confession of the accused is actually a weak form of evidence which may be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word as to presence of some light at the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners together on the motorcycle at 4.
The former means “guilty act” as well as latter means “guilty mind.” With the omission in the intention, the commission of the act by yourself is just not adequate to gain a conviction for that crime. This is often a essential principle that all law students are well acquainted with.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we are on the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are topic to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case with the petitioners for promotion can be thought of, however, we're obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy topic towards the approval in the competent authority.
Section 302 on the PPC deals with one of many most serious offenses in criminal legislation: murder. In this blog post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, website examine the punishment it entails, and assess some notable case laws related to this particular section.
be founded without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is really a horrifying reality, an especially lower threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A just isn't obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
after release from the prison he lost interest to contest the moment appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
Please note, If you're seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Здесь представлены рекомендации и описания способов лечения данным заболеванием.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held because of the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--